Science Material Transfer Agreement
AUTM. UBMTA Signatory. autm.net/surveys-and-tools/agreements/material-transfer-agreements/mta-toolkit/uniform-biological-material-transfer-agreement/ubmta-signatories. Access to May 26, 2020. The most obvious and fundamental principle for academic and academic researchers is to preserve the full capacity to publish their findings. Freedom of publication may be restricted by MTAs if the provider needs editorial rights over a publication or the right of approval and, after conclusion, refusal of a publication. Publication restrictions can also be displayed indirectly in MTAs. For example, the material itself can be declared confidential, making it impossible to publish meaningfully. Of particular concern are the serious consequences of a publication restriction for students whose future depends so much on publication. It is clear that this is a principle that a university cannot compromise, and the principle is so widespread that one might think that it is not even under discussion. But sometimes it`s the sequel. To complicate matters, perspectives may change depending on the role. A university that seeks to commercialize its intellectual property could, when it comes to making materials available to researchers elsewhere, look at things more from an industry perspective.
And, said Leonard, “if you look at the industry, three types of MTAs are the most common in academic institutions: the transfer between academic or research institutions, the transfer of science to industry and the transfer of industry to science. Everyone demands different conditions.  It wasn`t just researchers who were dissatisfied with MTAs. Even Leonard, who is responsible for negotiating the agreements at hHMI, has agreed that they are problematic. “This is an exodus in terms of time and administrative resources,” she said. “There is also a huge delay. This can be crucial for scientists, especially post-docctors, who are under pressure to do things and start their careers. If a problem arises during a transfer between academic institutions, it is usually because the equipment has been authorized exclusively and the terms of that agreement impose certain restrictions on the institution that supplies the material. However, this problem can generally be avoided, particularly where such exclusive licenses expressly reserve the right to use materials for internal research purposes and to transfer research materials to other academic institutions. Thus, the University of California will regularly include in its exclusive licensing agreements the following clause: AUTM`s MTA Toolkit, despite the recognized benefits of standard agreements and the encouragement to use them, has resulted in a missed opportunity to remove barriers to hardware transfer.